Great Panther Silver (TSX:GPR) (“Great Panther”; or the “Company”) reports the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment (the “PEA”) for its 100% owned Coricancha gold-silver-lead-zinc-copper underground mine and mill complex (“Coricancha”). Coricancha is located approximately 90 kilometres east of Lima, Peru, and was acquired by Great Panther in June 2017. Coricancha has a 600 tonne per day processing plant and is fully permitted for production. Production was suspended at Coricancha in 2013 by the previous owner. The PEA will be filed on SEDAR and EDGAR within 45 days of this news release.
“We are very pleased with the results of the Coricancha PEA as it confirms the potential for average annual production of three million silver-equivalent ounces and estimates an after-tax internal rate of return in excess of 80%, with low capital costs”, stated James Bannantine, President and CEO. “We look forward to advancing Coricancha by building on the PEA and gaining a better understanding of the potential of the project as we begin preparations for full-scale mining and milling.”
With the PEA completed, Great Panther has decided to advance the project with the initiation of a trial stope and bulk sample program (the “Bulk Sample Program”) early in the third quarter of this year to further de-risk the project. The objective of the Bulk Sample Program is to provide confirmation of expectations regarding throughput, grades, and recoveries.
The PEA involved an in-depth review of underground development and mining methodologies, ore and waste handling, ore processing, tailings treatment and handling, environmental and social aspects, costs and sensitivities. The PEA focuses on the restart of Coricancha using existing processing plant infrastructure and a relatively small portion (approximately 28%) of the overall existing Mineral Resources (see press release dated December 20, 2017 and Cautionary Statement below) which are accessible through additional development work from existing mine workings. The focused mine plan provides insight as to the ability of Great Panther to restart Coricancha based on a relatively low initial capital investment which can be funded entirely from the Company’s current cash reserves. In the event the mine is returned to production, the development work in the PEA is expected to provide the opportunity to incorporate a greater portion of the existing resources into an expanded mine plan with a longer mine life. It is also expected to provide the access to conduct underground drilling, which may provide further opportunity to both add Mineral Resources, as defined by NI 43-101 and CIM Definition Standards (see Cautionary Note to United States Investors below) and extend the mine life.
Great Panther will leverage its expertise in developing and operating underground, narrow vein mines in Mexico to advance Coricancha. The existing infrastructure in place includes a crushing and grinding plant, flotation and bio-oxidation plant, electrical and water supply, plus existing mine access development. With development associated with the Bulk Sample Program starting in 2018, and following a successful outcome, the Company expects to be able to make a decision in early 2019 to commence the restart of Coricancha. The Company presently does not plan to complete a feasibility study in connection with any production decision due to (i) the existing processing plant facility, (ii) the ability to move ahead to development and production based on low initial capital costs, and (iii) the Company’s knowledge of the mine and resource base.
PEA Summary
The PEA was prepared by Golder & Associates Inc. based on the updated Mineral Resource Estimate. All amounts in this news release are in U.S. dollars (“USD”) unless otherwise noted. The summary of the PEA results is presented in the tables and charts below:
Table 1: Life of Mine Average Metal Prices, Grades, Recoveries and Payable Factors
Metals | Base Case Metal Price Assumptions | Head Grades | Recoveries | Effective Payable Factors |
Silver | $16.50/oz | 171 g/t | 92% | 90% |
Gold | $1,300/oz | 4.1 g/t | 80% | 97% |
Lead | $1.10/lb | 1.3 % | 77% | 94% |
Zinc | $1.50/lb | 2.6 % | 83% | 84% |
Copper | $3.00/lb | 0.4 % | 78% | 96% |
Table 2: Silver-Equivalent Grades and Net Smelter Return
Mineral Value | Unit | Value |
Head Grade | AgEq g/t | 768 |
Net Smelter Return (“NSR”) | $/tonne | $295 |
Table 3: PEA Base Case Summary
Input | Unit | Value |
Mine Plan | ||
Processed Tonnage (Life of Mine (“LOM”)) | Tonnes | 608,053 |
Target Average Annual Throughput | Tonnes/Year | 193,500 |
LOM | Years | 3.75 |
Metal Production (LOM) | ||
Silver | Million Ounces | 2.8 |
Gold | Thousand Ounces | 64.2 |
Lead | Million Pounds | 12.9 |
Zinc | Million Pounds | 28.6 |
Copper | Million Pounds | 2.3 |
Silver Equivalent Production | Million Ounces | 11.7 |
Average Annual Silver Equivalent Production | Million Ounces | 3.1 |
Gold Equivalent Production | Thousand Ounces | 149.0 |
Average Annual Gold Equivalent Production | Thousand Ounces | 39.7 |
Direct Operating Cost (per tonne) | ||
Mining Costs | $/tonne | $55.71 |
Processing Costs | $/tonne | $68.83 |
Site General and Administration (“G&A”) Costs | $/tonne | $19.88 |
Other G&A Costs | $/tonne | $3.64 |
Total Operating Costs | $/tonne | $148.06 |
Cost Summary | ||
Silver: | ||
LOM Cash Cost (per payable silver ounce) | $/ounce | $(14.06) |
LOM All-in Sustaining Cost (per payable silver ounce) | $/ounce | $(2.20) |
Gold: | ||
LOM Cash Cost (per payable gold ounce) | $/ounce | $70 |
LOM All-in Sustaining Cost (per payable gold ounce) | $/ounce | $547 |
Silver-Equivalent: | ||
LOM Cash Cost (per payable silver equivalent ounce) | $/ounce | $9.41 |
LOM All-in Sustaining Cost (per payable silver equivalent ounce) | $/ounce | $12.16 |
Gold-Equivalent: | ||
LOM Cash Cost (per payable gold equivalent ounce) | $/ounce | $742 |
LOM All-in Sustaining Cost (per payable gold equivalent ounce) | $/ounce | $958 |
Note: Silver equivalent, gold equivalent, and by-product credits used in the calculation of Cash Costs and All-in Sustaining Costs are based on Base Case Metal Price Assumptions as described in Table 1 above.
Table 4: Capital Cost Summary
Capital Cost | Initial ($M) | Sustaining ($M) | Total ($M) | ||
Mine Development | |||||
Lateral Development | $3.0 | $11.7 | $14.7 | ||
Vertical Development | $0.8 | $6.7 | $7.5 | ||
Rehabilitation | $1.6 | $0.0 | $1.6 | ||
Mine Development Contingency (10%) | $0.5 | $1.8 | $2.3 | ||
Subtotal | $5.9 | $20.2 | $26.1 | ||
Processing Plant | |||||
Process Plant Refurbish | $1.2 | $0.0 | $1.2 | ||
Process Plant Equipment | $0.6 | $0.0 | $0.6 | ||
Plant – Engineering, Procurement,
Construction Management (10%) |
$0.2 | $0.0 | $0.2 | ||
Plant Contingency (30%) | $0.6 | $0.0 | $0.6 | ||
Subtotal | $2.6 | $0.0 | $2.6 | ||
Other | |||||
Waste Rock Storage | $0.2 | $0.8 | $1.0 | ||
Tailings Dam | $0.0 | $2.3 | $2.3 | ||
Underground Ancillary Equipment | $0.1 | $0.0 | $0.1 | ||
Other Contingency (10%) | $0.0 | $0.3 | $0.3 | ||
Subtotal | $0.3 | $3.4 | $3.7 | ||
Total Capital Costs | $8.8 | $23.6 | $32.4 |
Note: Initial Capital is defined as any capital expenditure incurred prior to …read more
From:: Investing News Network