Source: Michael J. Ballanger for Streetwise Reports 07/18/2018
Precious metals expert Michael Ballanger discusses down periods in the gold and silver markets that presaged large gains.
There was a time not very long ago when hard work, honest execution, determination and honor contributed to financial security. In special cases, extraordinary application of those four practices resulted in financial windfall, as in the case of the visionary entrepreneurs from Benjamin Franklin to James Watt to Henry Ford to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.
In the 1980–2000 era, enormous fortunes were also created by those men and women daring enough to use funds from private investors to allow them to carry out and complete geological theories resulting in massive discoveries, be it in oil and gas or minerals. The early investors in many of Murray Pezim’s (a Toronto-born butcher turned Vancouver mining promoter) deals lost heavily but those that stayed with him were made ridiculously wealthy with the Hemlo and Eskay Creek gold discoveries of the 1980s. Robert Friedland’s Galactic Resources filed for bankruptcy in 1992 but investors loyal to Friedland in 1994 wound up owning Diamondfields and by 1997, it was taken out by Inco for $4.3 billion after the Voisey’s Bay nickel discovery.
Now, the biggest discovery I was ever involved with as a corporate finance executive was the Mountain Province discovery of 1995 where 3.76 ct/t was considered “$1,000 (per tonne) rock!” and I was rewarded by a jump from $0.39 (where we funded it) to the ultimate peak $9.75/share. Today, with zinc at $1.36/lb. after literally decades in the $0.50s and $0.60s, the value-per-tonne of a 10% grade intercept is noteworthy and similarly, with gold at $1,260/ounce versus $300–400/ounce where it resided for most of the 1990s, a 6 g/t intercept is a big deal because most of the deposits are lucky to carry sufficient scale and continuity in order to qualify as economic.
However, today, unlike the 1980–2000 period, massive intercepts are treated as “leper colony” events and are a clarion call to “SELL! SELL! SELL!” because there is absolutely no marginal buyer cognizant of the long-term accretive powers of a major discovery (which add more reserves to inventory) that will go to his/her board of directors with a scrap of Bloomberg Terminal ticker tape pitching it on the basis of being “good for our company.”
To wit, look at the past thirty days where these results were reported:
June 27th: Fremont Gold Ltd. (FRE:TSX.V) Gold Drills 25.9m @ 4.66 g/t Au at Gold Bar Project, Nevada
Stock spikes to $0.22 in March on speculation and to $0.18 the day of the announcement; four trading days later the stock trades down to $0.12.
June 26th: Tinka Resources Ltd. (TK:TSX.V; TLD:FSE; TKRFF:OTCPK) drills 10.4 meters grading 44.0% zinc in new discovery of exceptional zinc grade at Ayawilca
Stock trades 2.7 million shares immediately after the announcement and then sells back down to within pennies of its recently completed $0.485/unit private placement.
June 28th: American Pacific Mining Corp. (USGD:CSE;USGDF:OTCPK) Drills 16 g/t Gold over 1.5 Meters at Tuscarora
Stock opens immediately after the NR at $0.215 then sells down to $0.18 and closes $0.19 on 670,250 volume.
This latter company is included because it is a company actively covered by Bob Moriarty of 321gold.com and it really shows you just how rotten sentiment is when even one of his sponsors can’t catch a bid.
Conditions such as these are symptomatic of market bottoms where gargantuan amounts of fear have replaced smidgeons of greed in setting the tone for reactions to positive exploration news. This condition is diametrically opposite to what we encounter in the overall stock market where negative news are greeted with a persistent “Buy the dip” mentality, the product of incessant, predictable interventions by government-policy-directed trading desks of the major banks. Retail investors have been trained in a Pavlovian sequence of behavior modification resulting in well engrained neural responses to stocks and gold fed and fueled by the MSM and championed by the bank-sponsored cable networks led by CNBC.
Adding insult to injury, the new generation of investors led by the Generation X, Generation Y (echo-boomers) and Millennials, with the prior two setting the standard for and handing down the investing baton to the latter. Take the Generation Y group, born between 1970 and 1990. They are now considerably larger than their Gen X predecessors (the “baby-bust generation”) but they are now between 18 and 38 and represent the vast majority of new investors AND investment managers. Furthermore, they have grown up during a period of financial entitlement, where government bailouts protect stocks at the risk of immense moral hazard, the nature of which is being felt and witnessed by subdued attitudes toward risk and elevated expectations toward reward. They forge ahead as a thundering herd of demographic chaos, buying companies with zero earnings and enormous debt (Tesla?), gravitating toward the technology sector due to their considerable familiarity with its products, and pushing prices and valuations to the absolute extreme of any and all valuation metrics with full expectations of winning. And guess what? Since the 2007–2008 GFC, that strategy has been 100% effective because by aligning themselves as a voting bloc of investment consensus, they are able to control downside reactions and manage upside probes through Twitter and Facebook, text messaging and email. And, of course, with the full support of the U.S. Fed, the BoJ, the BoC and the ECB.
So in trying to come to grips with my dismally performing junior mining portfolio of explorers and developers, I have reached the stage where I am finally contemplating capitulation and surrender. I am a hair’s breadth away from throwing in the proverbial bloodstained towel and avoiding the gold and silver sectors in the interest of capital preservation and survival. Now, having said that, I would also remind you of a similar notion communicated (with high anxiety …read more
From:: The Gold Report