Russia’s comeback in Africa favours profit over long-term influence — analyst

While Russia has been playing for power in Africa in recent years by sending arms, offering mercenaries and cinching mining deals, the foundations of Moscow’s claim to renewed global influence are shaky at best, a new political risks report claims.

The reality, says Daragh
McDowell, analyst at consultancy Verisk Maplecroft, is that
the Kremlin is putting profit ahead of power, and is relying on private
military contractors (PMCs) and “political technologists” to project its
influence on the world.

Russia, however, can only use such deployments in states with weak democratic and legal norms, and is doing so primarily to secure mineral rights and concessions in exchange for “services” rendered,  McDowell argues.

Such “deals” are creating a scenario in which Russian claims to a host of resources, many vital for the production of electric batteries and other next-generation technologies, are dependent on governments’ good will that Moscow is ill-equipped to stay in power, the analyst warns.

Russia’s incursions into the continent riches have seen state-owned companies targeting key commodities, such as gold, coltan, cobalt and diamonds.

Russia has moved to take advantage
of a desire by African countries — which, notably, are the largest voting bloc
in the United Nations — to lessen their reliance on China. The strategy  has, so far, worked, even with President
Vladimir Putin acknowledging his administration cannot come close to matching
Beijing’s financial firepower.

According to official figures, Russia’s
annual volume of its trade with Africa has doubled to $20 billion over the last
five years, but that still pales in comparison to the continent’s $300 billion
in trade with the European Union and $60 billion with the United States in
2018.

Moscow’s focus on the continent riches has seen state-owned companies scaling up their activities in the resources sector, particularly in the search and production of coltan, cobalt, gold and diamonds.

In Zimbabwe, for instance, a 2018
joint venture between Russia’s JSC Afromet and Zimbabwe’s Pen East began developing
one of the world’s largest deposits of platinum group metals.

In Angola, diamond giant Alrosa (MCX:ALRS), the world’s top producer by output, increased its stake in local miner Catoca to 41%, which provides the Russian company with a production base outside the home country.

Private energy giant Lukoil is
reported to have projects in Cameroon, Ghana and Nigeria and be looking to
acquire a stake in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Russia is also offering nuclear
power technology for several African countries, including the construction this
year of the first nuclear plant in Egypt, financed by a $25-billion loan.

The main risk related to Putin’s
ongoing strategy in Africa, McDowell says, is who would own the resources
targeted by partnerships if local allies give Russia their back.

“Guinea is an example of the
potential downside for Russia if local allies fail. Prompted by Guinea’s
importance as a supplier of bauxite for Russian aluminium producer Rusal,
Russian diplomats in the capital, Conakry, have openly supported President
Alpha Condé’s efforts to extend his term in office; this has helped fuel months
of increasingly bloody civil unrest,” McDowell notes.

Presidential and legislative
elections in Guinea are due in 2020, and China is also competing with Russia
for access to its bauxite and iron ore deposits. A scenario could arise, the
analyst warns, where a new leadership could challenge or reverse mineral deals
agreed by President Condé.

At that point, who “owns” Guinean
bauxite or iron ore would become a matter to be disputed globally, with
consequences to be seen, McDowell concludes.