“Deep down, he’s shallow,” said critic Peter DeVries of one author, famously revered.
Today we submit the case that Friday’s GDP report — grand, gaudy and garish — is deeply shallow beneath the scintillated surface.
That is, the deeper numbers tell a tale 180 degrees out of joint with appearance.
And private-sector growth may actually peg along at the crawlingest rate in six years.
Let us now peek within and beneath official data…
Friday’s official 3.2% trounced all reasonable estimate, all respected opinion.
Even the Federal Reserve’s chronically cheerful Atlanta squad pegged Q1 GDP at 2.8%.
But scratch the surface and what do we find? What accounts for the screaming headline number?
Companies will often amass inventories to jump out ahead of expected tariffs.
Inventories have been mounting for the past year and then some… rising some 8%.
And data reveal American business piled up $32 billion of inventoried goods the first quarter — a $46.3 billion swelling over the previous quarter.
Government bean counters heap inventories into the column of business investment. Thus in the official telling, they add to the gross domestic product.
Says the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Q1 rising inventory contributed 0.65 percentage points to real GDP.
Rinse them out and we have Q1 growth of 2.55%… not 3.2%.
2.55% is still handsome. Most original Q1 estimates came in under 2%.
But Daily Reckoning affiliate Wolf Richter takes the longer view:
Rising inventories, which are considered an investment and add to GDP, are eventually followed by a decline in inventories when companies whittle them down again, and there is a price to pay for it…
Companies that sit on that inventory and have trouble selling it will at some point cut their orders to reduce their inventories. When this happens, sales drop all the way up the supply chain… when businesses whittle down their inventories by ordering less, it ripples through the economy, lowers GDP growth…
Affirms a swarm of Morgan Stanley economists:
“The buildup in inventories over the past several quarters points to a large reversal in the second quarter.”
How about the third… and the fourth?
Meantime, we are informed the false fireworks of government spending account for another portion of the final 3.2%.
But according to the ladies and gentlemen of Oxford Economics, one metric tells tell a far truer tale of GDP:
Final sales to domestic purchasers.
What if we run the blue pencil through Q1 inventory and government GDP contributions… and cleave to final sales alone?
Q1 GDP increased not 3.2% or even 2.6% after subtracting government’s “addition” — but a wilting 1.3%.
1.3% is miles and miles and miles behind the official 3.2%.
Let us peek even deeper beneath the shimmering surface…
Q1 consumer durable goods spending sank 5.3%… the steepest plunge in 10 years.
Private-sector consumption and investment — the pounding pulse of a healthful economy — trickled to a semi-comatose 1.3%.
That is the faintest increase in nearly six years.
Consumer spending overall increased a mere 1.2%… off from 2.5% the quarter previous.
And from last quarter’s 5.4%, business investment halved — to 2.7%.
MarketWatch informs us that investments in factories, offices, stores and oil wells sank for the third-straight quarter.
It further informs us that investments in equipment such as computers, aircraft and machinery overall scratched out a piddling 0.2% increase.
Is this the eight-cylinder roar of a throbbing economic engine?
“On the outside, it looks like a shiny muscle car,” writes Bernard Baumohl of the Economic Outlook Group…
“Lift the hood, however, and you see a fragile one-cylinder engine.”
Former Obama economic adviser and present Harvard grandee Jason Furman takes his own disappointing glance under the hood:
“First-quarter GDP is 3.2%, but the underlying data is much weaker and is consistent with a slowing economy.”
The aforesaid Oxford Economics affirms the economy is “undeniably cooling.”
Meantime, the Federal Reserve huddles at Washington this week.
What does Friday’s GDP report implicate for interest rates?
Despite the dazzling headline number, the Federal Reserve’s “Open Market” Committee will hold rates steady. They will certainly not raise rates.
Why are we so certain?
Official inflation data.
The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge — which excludes more fluid food and energy prices — increased not a jot last month.
And it has increased only 1.6% year over year.
So the Federal Reserve remains hopelessly asea, as far as ever from its infinitely elusive 2% target.
And it will cut rates before raising rates — depend on it.
Managing editor, The Daily Reckoning