{"id":1113303,"date":"2019-04-25T19:52:47","date_gmt":"2019-04-25T19:52:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/?p=107300"},"modified":"2019-04-25T19:52:47","modified_gmt":"2019-04-25T19:52:47","slug":"is-inflation-dead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/?p=1113303","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIs Inflation Dead?\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-inflation-dead\/\">\u201cIs Inflation Dead?\u201d<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Today we don the prophet\u2019s motley, climb atop our soapbox&#8230; and holler a thumping prediction.<\/p>\n<p>For we have indication \u2014 reliable indication \u2014 that an established trend will soon end. And that another will begin.<\/p>\n<p>But what established trend? How will it end? And why so all-fired important?<\/p>\n<p>Answers anon. But first an after-action report on today\u2019s combats\u2026<\/p>\n<p>The bears won \u2014 if barely.<\/p>\n<p>The Dow Jones lost 135 points today. The S&amp;P was essentially even on the day. The Nasdaq, meantime, turned in a 16-point gain.<\/p>\n<p>Mixed earnings reports \u2014 some swell, some not \u2014 largely cancelled each other.<\/p>\n<p>We now turn and face the future, by first turning and facing the past \u2014 Aug. 13, 1979, to be precise.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"centered subhead small\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>\u201cThe Death of Equities,\u201d 2019 Version<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>On that date <em>BusinessWeek <\/em>announced before the world \u201cThe Death of Equities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For nearly 15 years the stock market had been sunk in the crushing deeps of a bear market. Why should it end?<\/p>\n<p>Dazzled and blinkered by the present\u2019s brilliant focus, the wise men of <em>BusinessWeek<\/em> had forgotten about the past.<\/p>\n<p>This time is different, they believed.<\/p>\n<p>They forgot that markets move in clockwork cycles, that the wheel swings around eventually, that the full circle runs to 360 degrees.<\/p>\n<p>The gods pointed, laughed\u2026 and plotted.<\/p>\n<p>By 1982 the loveliest bull market in all of history was underweigh. It roared and raged for nearly 20 years following.<\/p>\n<p>Come we now to this headline in another <em>BusinessWeek<\/em> \u2014 <em>Bloomberg Businessweek<\/em> \u2014 dated April 17, 2019:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs Inflation Dead?\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"centered\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"centered aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/paradigmpress-uploads\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/dr_is_inflation_dead.jpeg\" alt=\"Is Infaltion Dead?\" \/><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"centered subhead small\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>\u201cIt Is Always Different \u2014 Until It Is Once Again the Same\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>As the case for stocks was laughed out of court in 1979, so the case for inflation is laughed out of court today.<\/p>\n<p>As in 1979, today\u2019s professional men believe this time is different.<\/p>\n<p>They tell us globalization, a \u201csavings glut\u201d or productivity increases through technology have licked inflation for good.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the heroic sweating of the printing press and all the angels and saints, they remind us, the Federal Reserve cannot work a sustained 2% inflation rate.<\/p>\n<p>Why should it change now?<\/p>\n<p>But it is always different \u2014 until it is once again the same.<\/p>\n<p>Here at <em>The Daily Reckoning<\/em> we take the overall view, the long view \u2014 the view <em>sub specie aeternitatis.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And in the grand sweep, the cycle completes.<\/p>\n<p>Now that the Bloomberg men have tugged on Fate\u2019s cape good and hard\u2026 now that they have suggested inflation\u2019s permanent demise\u2026<\/p>\n<p>We have our perfect contrarian indicator.<\/p>\n<p>We must conclude that inflation lurks in the offstage wings, awaiting word from the gods.<\/p>\n<p>But if the Federal Reserve has proven unable to whip disinflation with its deep bag of tricks, how will inflation make its entrance?<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"centered subhead small\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>How Might Inflation Return?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>We have suggested it previously, if only from a glancing angle:<\/p>\n<p>Modern Monetary Theory \u2014 MMT.<\/p>\n<p>Come the next downturn, the Federal Reserve will blast us with the same quantitative easing and zero interest rates it inflicted upon us last time.<\/p>\n<p>It may also have a go at negative interest rates.<\/p>\n<p>But much of its \u201cdry powder\u201d the Federal Reserve used against the last crisis. Its stocks remain heavily depleted, despite efforts to reload.<\/p>\n<p>Like last time, its false fireworks may scintillate the stock market \u2014 in the near run at least.<\/p>\n<p>Also like last time, they will work limited effect upon the economy of people, places and things.<\/p>\n<p>That is, upon the real economy.<\/p>\n<p>And negative interest rates have failed to meet their advertising where tried, Japan and Europe being cases brilliantly in point.<\/p>\n<p>There is little reason to expect they will succeed in these United States.<\/p>\n<p>No, the central banks are tied hand and foot.<\/p>\n<p>Now enter MMT\u2026<\/p>\n<p class=\"centered subhead small\"><strong>The \u201cPerfect Theory for Our Times\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>MMT will parade as quantitative easing for Main Street.<\/p>\n<p>Through the miracle of the printing press a healthy inflation will finally emerge from its cage.<\/p>\n<p>If it strays too far or begins to snarl, the tax man will go chasing after it.<\/p>\n<p>Higher taxes will simply vacuum surplus money from the economy and jam inflation back in its cell.<\/p>\n<p>MMT further promises universal health care, full employment, college free of charge, a throbbing economic engine, a thermostatic correction of the planetary temperature\u2026 and more.<\/p>\n<p>Thus MMT is the \u201cperfect theory for our times\u201d explains former Morgan Stanley global strategist Gerard Minack:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>One reason this may be attractive is that it is increasingly clear that monetary policy is exhausted, at least in the developed economies\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>It seems to me that MMT is the perfect theory for the times. It appears to justify a switch from monetary to fiscal policy as the key tool of macro management\u2026 it can also be used to fund popular policies\u2026 Put simply, this would see fiscal policy play the role that monetary policy has played for decades\u2026 The key point now is that MMT is being used as an argument to justify important policy changes\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2 class=\"centered subhead small\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>An End to \u201cSecular Stagnation\u201d and the \u201cSavings Glut\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>And through public spending MMT promises to murder the \u201csecular stagnation\u201d and \u201csavings glut\u201d that presently ride and torture the economic establishment.<\/p>\n<p>Lower interest rates and further monetary gimcrack cannot.<\/p>\n<p>Minack:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>If this policy approach were implemented it would be fatal to secular stagnation&#8230; For 30 years the main policy response to this [problem] has been to reduce interest rates&#8230; The point is that it has required lower and lower rates to achieve any given growth rate. Increased public dis-saving is the direct antidote to the private sector\u2019s rising saving\u2026 if there is a broad-based adoption of MMT in the next downturn, it will end the secular stagnation era.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>We are skeptical \u2014 deeply \u2014 that a \u201csavings glut\u201d has any existence whatsoever.<\/p>\n<p>As well argue that a \u201cwealth glut\u201d exists. Moreover, that it takes the form of a public menace.<\/p>\n<p>But our larger point, sharp as pins, is that MMT is beginning to get a hearing.<\/p>\n<p>To date a mere handful of Democratic officials and presidential aspirants have bellowed for MMT.<\/p>\n<p>But come the next downturn and the Federal Reserve\u2019s botched rescue, the chorus will swell \u2014 depend on it.<\/p>\n<p>Just so, you say.<\/p>\n<p>But the Republicans will never let it through. They may be a gang of scoundrels in their own right. But even they will go only so far.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"centered subhead small\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>\u201cModern Monetary Theory for Conservatives\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>But Republicans too sense changes in the wind. They too can jab a moist index finger in the air to determine which way it blows.<\/p>\n<p>Might they hatch a \u201cconservative\u201d MMT to position themselves upwind of public opinion?<\/p>\n<p>But does a conservative MMT even exist?<\/p>\n<p>Yes, says a certain Steve Englander, who directs global research at Standard Chartered Bank.<\/p>\n<p>He is also the author of \u201cModern Monetary Theory for Conservatives.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>From which:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>A conservative version of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) could arguably work just as well as the standard progressive version\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>But instead of funding lavish and exotic government spending, a conservative MMT would finance tax cuts.<\/p>\n<p>But have they not tried tax cuts already to little general effect?<\/p>\n<p>Yes, but an MMT-backed tax cut would hacksaw taxes to the extent a progressive MMT would heave forth money.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"centered subhead small\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Two Approaches, Same Result<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The gargantuan tax savings would then go flooding onto Main Street.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Englander:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>The economic outcomes from the lower-tax version of MMT would likely be indistinguishable from the higher spending version&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>In the first case, the private sector is expected to do the spending, in the second, the government&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"blockquote\"><em>The same principles could be used to justify a very different agenda than is commonly associated with MMT. The core idea that central bank-financed deficits drive activity and inflation remains the same.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This Englander says he does not advocate any such plan \u2014 merely that it is possible.<\/p>\n<p>But might some enterprising politicos haul it out as a more \u201csensible\u201d alternative to a lunatic progressive MMT?<\/p>\n<p>Why not?<\/p>\n<p>Might it blast identical holes in the deficit?<\/p>\n<p>Well, maybe it would. But recall, deficits do not matter.<\/p>\n<p>This we have on authority of a former Republican vice president.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, you cannot beat something with nothing, he might say.<\/p>\n<p>We must do something. This is something. We must therefore do it.<\/p>\n<p>Progressive MMT, conservative MMT, the end is the same.<\/p>\n<p>And either could be one good crisis away&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Regards,<\/p>\n<p>Brian Maher<br \/>\nManaging editor, <em>The Daily Reckoning<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-inflation-dead\/\">\u201cIs Inflation Dead?\u201d<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-inflation-dead\/\">&ldquo;Is Inflation Dead?&rdquo;<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The Death of Equities,&rdquo; 2019 version&#8230; MMT: the &ldquo;perfect theory for our times&rdquo;&#8230; A conservative version of MMT?&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-inflation-dead\/\">&ldquo;Is Inflation Dead?&rdquo;<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[484,366,1325,463],"tags":[312],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113303"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1113303"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113303\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1113304,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113303\/revisions\/1113304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1113303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1113303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1113303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}