{"id":1009354,"date":"2018-09-14T21:00:20","date_gmt":"2018-09-14T21:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/?p=1009354"},"modified":"2018-09-14T21:00:20","modified_gmt":"2018-09-14T21:00:20","slug":"is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/?p=1009354","title":{"rendered":"Is Trump\u2019s Tax Cut \u201cPaying for Itself\u201d?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-style:italic;font-size:16px\">By  <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself\/\">Brian Maher<\/a><\/span>  <\/p>\n<div class=\"ftpimagefix\" style=\"float:left\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/agorafinancialwebsite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/dr_chart_09142018_where_will_the_growth_come_from.png\" alt=\"Chart\"><\/a><\/div>\n<p>This post <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself\/\">Is Trump&#8217;s Tax Cut \u201cPaying for Itself\u201d?<\/a> appeared first on <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There is absolutely nothing wrong with America&#8217;s finances that a miracle couldn&#8217;t fix\u2026 as the great man said.<\/p>\n<p>We learn this week that 2018&#8217;s budget deficit currently rises Himalayan-high to $895 billion \u2014 a 39% increase over last year.<\/p>\n<p>The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) announced in April that the budget deficit would exceed $1 trillion in 2020.<\/p>\n<p>But CBO now estimates the deficit will top $1 trillion in 2019\u2026 one year ahead of schedule.<\/p>\n<p>The reason, simple as snow and as obvious as the nose on a man&#8217;s face:<\/p>\n<p>The United States government lays out far more money than it hauls aboard.<\/p>\n<p>The Republic demands its bread\u2026 circuses\u2026 its gladiator combats.<\/p>\n<p>But it prefers to buy on credit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDefense\u201d spending \u2014 up 10% on the year\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Social Security outlays \u2014 up 5%\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Medicare \u2014 up 7%.<\/p>\n<p>Overall federal spending has increased 7% this fiscal year\u2026 while tax revenues have increased only 1%.<\/p>\n<p>To the business we must add a 25% increase in net interest on the public debt.<\/p>\n<p>The economic men in practice at Washington assured us the Trump tax cuts would \u201cpay for themselves\u201d through higher growth.<\/p>\n<p>Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin \u2014 for example \u2014 assured us, \u201cThe plan will pay for itself with growth.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Then we come to President Trump&#8217;s senior economic adviser\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Larry Kudlow is a swell enough fellow who is nonetheless trapped in 1981\u2026 like a fly trapped in amber.<\/p>\n<p>He argues that \u201cEven the CBO numbers show now that the entire $1.5 trillion tax cut is virtually paid for by higher revenues and better nominal GDP.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But if outlays are up 7% while revenues are up 1%\u2026 how is the entire $1.5 trillion tax cut being paid for by higher revenues and better nominal GDP?<\/p>\n<p>We will gladly take correction if mistaken.<\/p>\n<p>But in our court stands economist Greg Mankiw.<\/p>\n<p>Mankiw was George W. Bush&#8217;s chairman of the president&#8217;s Council of Economic Advisers.<\/p>\n<p>From whom:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>I do not know what numbers Larry is referring to\u2026 A reasonable rule of thumb, in my judgment, is that about one-third of the cost of tax cuts is recouped via faster economic growth.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>We&#8217;re heart and soul for tax cuts \u2014 provided they are twinned with spending cuts to match.<\/p>\n<p>There is something within the liver and lights that demands a square accounting.<\/p>\n<p>Spend less, it whispers \u2014 or more if you must.<\/p>\n<p>But pay your way as you go.<\/p>\n<p>Borrowing from tomorrow to pay for today is the way of the scoundrel\u2026 the profligate\u2026 the serial bankrupt.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe wicked borrows, and cannot pay back\u201d\u2026 as Psalm 37:21 reads.<\/p>\n<p>But worry not, soothes the official voice \u2014 deficits don&#8217;t matter.<\/p>\n<p>And for years they haven&#8217;t\u2026 or not overmuch.<\/p>\n<p>But the laws of economics will not be forever conned, the old-timers insist.<\/p>\n<p>Actions demand reactions\u2026 scales must ultimately balance\u2026 the free lunch has no existence this side of paradise.<\/p>\n<p>We suspect a great reckoning will prove once and for all that deficits do matter.<\/p>\n<p>At writing the national debt rings in at $21,479,156,738,092\u2026 and rising\u2026 rapidly.<\/p>\n<p>For your viewing pleasure, CBO&#8217;s projected trajectory of the national debt as a percentage of GDP:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The greatest burglars of America&#8217;s fiscal future?<\/p>\n<p>Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid\u2026 with interest on the debt into the bargain.<\/p>\n<p>If you accept the CBO at its word, mandatory spending \u2014 including these budget-busters and a few others \u2014 will constitute 78% of federal spending by 2026.<\/p>\n<p>That leaves only 22 cents per dollar for education, science, transportation and a hundred other priorities\u2026 including defense.<\/p>\n<p>Former Treasury official Peter Fisher&#8217;s waggish observation gains currency with each passing year:<\/p>\n<p>The federal government, says he, is a \u201cgigantic insurance company (with a sideline business in national defense and homeland security).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Much truth is spoken in jest.<\/p>\n<p>With a spirit of doom upon us today, let us sink further into the mire\u2026<\/p>\n<p>According to no less an authority than the United States Treasury, projected tax revenues to fund Social Security and Medicare over the next 75 years fall $46.7 trillion short.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnfunded liabilities,\u201d these are called.<\/p>\n<p>But even these $46.7 trillion of unfunded liabilities may tell a mere fraction of America&#8217;s true indebtedness\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Economist and Boston University professor Larry Kotlikoff says Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are not fully accounted for in official number crunching.<\/p>\n<p>These accounting shell games mask the actual debt, says Kotlikoff.<\/p>\n<p>What is America&#8217;s actual debt?<\/p>\n<p>Over the next 75 years, this Cassandra projects America&#8217;s true debt at an intergalactic <em>$210 trillion.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Kotlikoff, shaking his head in despair:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>We have all these unofficial debts that are massive compared to the official debt. We&#8217;re focused just on the official debt, so we&#8217;re trying to balance the wrong books\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>If you add up all the promises that have been made for spending obligations, including defense expenditures, and you subtract all the taxes that we expect to collect, the difference is $210 trillion. That&#8217;s the fiscal gap. That&#8217;s our true indebtedness.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Kind heaven, no \u2014 could our fair land be $210 trillion in debt?<\/p>\n<p>On days such as this, when our hopes for America crash upon the shoals of actuarial mathematics and we wonder why we even bother\u2026 our thoughts turn to author Robert Benchley.<\/p>\n<p>We have told the tale before, but today we tell it again\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Benchley sat at his typewriter one day to tackle a vexing subject.<\/p>\n<p>He got one word into it \u2014 \u201cThe\u201d \u2014 when he came upon a brick wall. The words would not come.<\/p>\n<p>He soon threw up the sponge\u2026 and abandoned his typewriter in frustration.<\/p>\n<p>After soaking his head in the hotel bar he returned to visit the task anew, freshly inspired.<\/p>\n<p>With only one word to work with \u2014 \u201cThe\u201d \u2014 Benchley rapidly hammered out his article, presented here in its entirety:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe hell with it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Regards,<\/p>\n<p>Brian Maher<br \/>\nManaging editor, <em>The Daily Reckoning<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The post <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself\/\">Is Trump&#8217;s Tax Cut \u201cPaying for Itself\u201d?<\/a> appeared first on <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself\/\" target=\"_blank\" id=\"rssmi_more\"> &#8230;read more<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>From:: <a href=\"https:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/is-trumps-tax-cut-paying-for-itself\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Is Trump\u2019s Tax Cut \u201cPaying for Itself\u201d?\">Daily Reckoning<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Brian Maher This post Is Trump&#8217;s Tax Cut \u201cPaying for Itself\u201d? appeared first on Daily Reckoning. There is absolutely nothing wrong with America&#8217;s finances that a miracle couldn&#8217;t fix\u2026 as the great man said. We learn this week that 2018&#8217;s budget deficit currently rises Himalayan-high to $895 billion \u2014 a 39% increase over last [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[366],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1009354"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1009354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1009354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1009354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1009354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/juniorminingnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1009354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}